Feedback Report
Feedback Consolidated Report (Arunachal Pradesh)
Total Trained Candidate: 592 | Total Feedback Count : 464 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 210 | 234 | 15 | 2 | 3 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 213 | 236 | 12 | 1 | 2 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 192 | 243 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 193 | 241 | 25 | 4 | 1 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 187 | 243 | 31 | 3 | 0 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 313 | 138 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 267 | 181 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 213 | 228 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 227 | 211 | 24 | 2 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 209 | 225 | 24 | 5 | 1 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 230 | 215 | 17 | 1 | 1 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Assam)
Total Trained Candidate: 6838 | Total Feedback Count : 5532 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 2986 | 2415 | 114 | 14 | 3 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 2570 | 2768 | 178 | 13 | 3 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 2422 | 2789 | 300 | 18 | 3 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 2599 | 2615 | 277 | 36 | 5 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 3002 | 2241 | 263 | 23 | 3 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 4069 | 1329 | 115 | 18 | 1 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 3526 | 1902 | 93 | 5 | 6 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 2813 | 2487 | 215 | 16 | 1 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 3100 | 2242 | 174 | 11 | 5 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 2715 | 2480 | 297 | 34 | 6 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 2718 | 2600 | 206 | 7 | 1 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Manipur)
Total Trained Candidate: 601 | Total Feedback Count : 539 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 224 | 295 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 187 | 334 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 175 | 324 | 39 | 0 | 1 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 174 | 319 | 43 | 0 | 3 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 153 | 313 | 58 | 13 | 2 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 291 | 238 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 252 | 271 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 229 | 285 | 23 | 1 | 1 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 230 | 273 | 35 | 0 | 1 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 191 | 295 | 46 | 5 | 2 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 240 | 278 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Meghalaya)
Total Trained Candidate: 428 | Total Feedback Count : 428 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 180 | 224 | 20 | 4 | 0 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 192 | 224 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 176 | 232 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 200 | 204 | 21 | 2 | 1 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 206 | 190 | 26 | 6 | 0 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 261 | 162 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 225 | 196 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 209 | 202 | 12 | 5 | 0 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 246 | 175 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 230 | 193 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 217 | 194 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Mizoram)
Total Trained Candidate: 257 | Total Feedback Count : 226 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 99 | 124 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 94 | 122 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 85 | 129 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 86 | 116 | 23 | 1 | 0 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 102 | 112 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 168 | 54 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 149 | 73 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 105 | 115 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 106 | 109 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 86 | 118 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 140 | 83 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Nagaland)
Total Trained Candidate: 275 | Total Feedback Count : 229 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 111 | 111 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 99 | 122 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 75 | 143 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 94 | 116 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 90 | 125 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 154 | 72 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 130 | 96 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 99 | 126 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 110 | 110 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 104 | 112 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 124 | 103 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Sikkim)
Total Trained Candidate: 172 | Total Feedback Count : 171 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 131 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 123 | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 124 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 120 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 141 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 150 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 140 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 127 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 134 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 141 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 126 | 42 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Feedback Consolidated Report (Tripura)
Total Trained Candidate: 837 | Total Feedback Count : 757 | S. No | Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | The training met my expectations | 407 | 301 | 44 | 2 | 3 |
2. | I will be able to apply the knowledge learned | 357 | 365 | 34 | 1 | 0 |
3. | The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed | 359 | 352 | 43 | 2 | 1 |
4. | The content was organized and easy to follow | 376 | 322 | 55 | 2 | 2 |
5. | The materials distributed were pertinent and useful | 363 | 327 | 51 | 13 | 3 |
6. | The trainer was knowledgeable | 518 | 219 | 19 | 1 | 0 |
7. | The quality of instruction was good | 432 | 288 | 34 | 2 | 1 |
8. | The trainer met the training objectives | 347 | 346 | 62 | 2 | 0 |
9. | Class participation and interaction were encouraged | 360 | 339 | 56 | 2 | 0 |
10. | Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion | 316 | 374 | 62 | 4 | 1 |
Excellent | Good | Average | Poor | Very Poor | ||
11 | How do you rate the training overall? | 395 | 332 | 26 | 2 | 2 |